Patient factors and concordance of the response when “minimally improved” considered as improvement.</p
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
<p>Patient Feedback on the Improvement of Each Specific Prescription Warning Label.</p
Comparison between reliability and satisfaction of subjects between Condition 1 and Condition 2.</p
Patient factors and concordance of the response, when “significantly improved” considered as improve...
Patient efficacy assessment as either slightly improved, mostly improved or not improved.</p
Comparative analysis of patient satisfaction between the control and intervention groups.</p
<p>Proportion of treatment groups showing improvement on performance measures and rating-scales (i.e...
Patient Reported Outcome Measures [PROMs] per condition and response rates [n = 39 studies].</p
Patients’ and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes for overall group and matched group af...
<p>Factors influencing patients’ satisfaction from logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and 95% ...
<p>Clinical variables for all responding patients from the different wards at T0 and T1 respectively...
Concordance correlation coefficient between converted numeric rating scale change and residual sympt...
Comparison of concordance rates between WFO and MDT stratified by clinical factors.</p
<p>Percentage of reliable improvement, reliable recovery and recovery by treatment.</p
<p>n: indicates the number of patients.</p><p>Self-perceived improvement on the CGI—I scale for the ...
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
<p>Patient Feedback on the Improvement of Each Specific Prescription Warning Label.</p
Comparison between reliability and satisfaction of subjects between Condition 1 and Condition 2.</p
Patient factors and concordance of the response, when “significantly improved” considered as improve...
Patient efficacy assessment as either slightly improved, mostly improved or not improved.</p
Comparative analysis of patient satisfaction between the control and intervention groups.</p
<p>Proportion of treatment groups showing improvement on performance measures and rating-scales (i.e...
Patient Reported Outcome Measures [PROMs] per condition and response rates [n = 39 studies].</p
Patients’ and treatment characteristics and clinical outcomes for overall group and matched group af...
<p>Factors influencing patients’ satisfaction from logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and 95% ...
<p>Clinical variables for all responding patients from the different wards at T0 and T1 respectively...
Concordance correlation coefficient between converted numeric rating scale change and residual sympt...
Comparison of concordance rates between WFO and MDT stratified by clinical factors.</p
<p>Percentage of reliable improvement, reliable recovery and recovery by treatment.</p
<p>n: indicates the number of patients.</p><p>Self-perceived improvement on the CGI—I scale for the ...
Comparisons of clinical outcome between the severe group and the moderate group.</p
<p>Patient Feedback on the Improvement of Each Specific Prescription Warning Label.</p
Comparison between reliability and satisfaction of subjects between Condition 1 and Condition 2.</p
DOI
Add to ORKG